www.segra.org

The usage of natural gas energy has rendered methods of energy generation like wind power, virtually outdated. More people are content with using natural energy methods rather than wind energy generation methods. Studies have shown that there has been a 75% slow down in the number of people who used to generate energy through wind power. The primary advantage of natural gas energy methods is that they are very cheap. Even though there was a prediction that green energy industries will see a boom in the number of jobs this year, there have been mass lay-offs which have resulted in the disinterest of people.

Since the natural gas energy methods are cheaper as compared to other alternatives, most people are opting for it. The green energy projects are not able to compete with the sudden fall in prices and are being rendered the less preferred of the two. Since there is a recession going on, most companies are taking up natural gas energy rather than solar or wind power because of the high initial cost. Another fact is that many new gas reserves have been found in the last year and a half which has further helped in reducing the price.

Many investors are disinterested in investing money in projects which will take lots of time as well as cost more. Wind power requires a lot of investment and ongoing maintenance work as well which outs a lot of financial pressure on the investors. In these times of recession, it is only logical that they try to cut down on the expenses as much as possible. Natural gas energy reserves are being discovered all over the world and this has resulted in a global crisis for wind power projects. The low cost of investment helps in cutting down losses in this recession struck period.

It is the desire of many people to get away from fossil fuel and begin using more green solar energy. There are several benefits from making that move, not the least of which is a dramatic savings on your monthly utility bills, and reducing the carbon footprint of the people that use this form of energy.. To really understand how you can use green solar energy, you first need to understand the two basic types people typically refer to.

Green solar energy usually is considered Light Energy, and Thermal Energy. When harnessed, these two types of energy can provide a good renewable form of energy

Light Energy

When most people think of “Solar Energy,” This is what they think of. It allows you to capture the light energy from the sun using solar panels, which convert that light into electricity. That electricity can then be used to power electrical appliances around your home.

If you are in an area that has a lot of direct sunlight, or if you have enough solar panels, you can generate enough energy to completely power your home. By using batteries you will be able to store the electricity for use at night, or on days where the sun is hidden behind the clouds. In fact, it is quite possible to drive your electric bill down to zero.

There are quite a few DIY programs that are available that make it possible to build your own solar generators. While it does take more effort on your part, it can greatly reduce the cost of converting your home to green solar energy.

Thermal Energy

Another form of solar energy is Thermal Solar Energy. Thermal solar energy capture the heat from the sun, and uses it to keep your home warm. This can be accomplished in the design of a home by positioning windows so they receive the most light during the day, and by using building materials that retain the heat longer.

Another form of thermal solar energy is using collector panels that collect the heat for other uses. These could be used for heating water for home use, heating swimming pools, and could be used for solar ovens for cooking food.

It is very possible for us to become more green, and to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. Using green solar energy we will be able to have renewable sources of energy for use in our homes, and we can greatly reduce the amount of money we spend. Going green does not mean you have to do without the things you enjoy, it means looking for more environmentally friendly ways to power our lives.

VMware Virtual Infrastructure from STL Technologies will significantly reduce your business’s IT costs – and improve performance at the same time.

Cost cutting through server consolidation

VMware Virtual Infrastructure ensures your costs are cut through server consolidation. In other words a reduction in physical servers brings you:

Lower support costs and lower energy costs Quick, reliable and affordable disaster recovery across all your applications Dramatically-reduced hardware costs through better utilisation of servers and desktops … resulting in a return on your investment within just 12 months Significant ‘green’ energy savings – and, therefore, even greater cost reductions Better desktop management

STL Technologies specialises in designing software systems for public and private sector organisations.

Our clients include:

The Ministry of Justice – we wrote the integrated case management system for magistrates courts across England May Gurney, the construction services specialists – we provide a comprehensive consultancy service for the company covering the future direction of their IT system, business analysis and process change, plus software support and maintenance The Police – we provide case management and custody applications, with software and services that integrate with different business applications

Among our many other clients are primary schools, solicitors and doctors’ surgeries – while industries include agriculture, financial services, pharmaceuticals, housing and utilities.

Remarkably, over the past five years STL Technologies has doubled in size, with staff numbers up from 75 to160 and annual turnover now at over £14 million.

The reason? In fact, there are several, but we find it is the way we work that appeals to our clients. For example:

We take a partnership approach – everything we do has our clients’ business objectives in mind. We have considerable expertise in secure systems – derived from delivering high profile systems for government. We ensure an account manager is always assigned to each client Our highly skilled technical staff has wide product knowledge and expertise Our Advanced Technology Centre offers the industry’s latest technology within a high-tech lab environment Our knowledge and experience of virtualisation, telephony, voice over IP, case management and CRM, and unified communications are unsurpassed.

The Germans have really taken off when it comes to renewable fuel sources, and have become one of the major players in the alternative energy game. Under the aegis of the nation’s electricity feed laws, the German people set a world record in 2006 by investing over $10 billion (US) in research, development, and implementation of wind turbines, biogas power plants, and solar collection cells. Germany’s “feed laws” permit the German homeowners to connect to an electrical grid through some source of renewable energy and then sell back to the power company any excess energy produced at retail prices. This economic incentive has catapulted Germany into the number-one position among all nations with regards to the number of operational solar arrays, biogas plants, and wind turbines. The 50-terawatt hours of electricity produced by these renewable energy sources account for 10% of all of Germany’s energy production per year. In 2006 alone, Germany installed 100,000 solar energy collection systems.

Over in the US, the BP corporation has established an Energy Biosciences Institute (EBI) to spearhead extensive new research and development efforts into clean burning renewable energy sources, most prominently biofuels for ground vehicles. BP’s investment comes to $50 million (US) per year over the course of the next decade. This EBI will be physically located at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The University is in partnership with BP, and it will be responsible for research and development of new biofuel crops, biofuel-delivering agricultural systems, and machines to produce renewable fuels in liquid form for automobile consumption. The University will especially spearhead efforts in the field of genetic engineering with regard to creating the more advanced biofuel crops. The EBI will additionally have as a major focal point technological innovations for converting heavy hydrocarbons into pollution-free and highly efficient fuels.

Also in the US, the battle rages on between Congress and the Geothermal Energy Association (GEA). The GEA’s Executive Director Karl Gawell has recently written to the Congress and the Department of Energy, the only way to ensure that DOE and OMB do not simply revert to their irrational insistence on terminating the geothermal research program is to schedule a congressional hearing specifically on geothermal energy, its potential, and the role of federal research. Furthermore, Gawell goes on to say that recent studies by the National Research Council, the Western Governors’ Association Clean Energy Task Force and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology all support expanding geothermal research funding to develop the technology necessary to utilize this vast, untapped domestic renewable energy resource. Supporters of geothermal energy, such as this writer, are amazed at the minuscule amount of awareness that the public has about the huge benefits that research and development of the renewable alternative energy source would provide the US, both practically and economically. Geothermal energy is already less expensive to produce in terms of kilowatt-hours than the coal that the US keeps mining. Geothermal energy is readily available, sitting just a few miles below our feet and easily accessible through drilling. One company, Ormat, which is the third largest geothermal energy producer in the US and has plants in several different nations, is already a billion-dollar-per-year business-geothermal energy is certainly economically viable.

In order to effectively understand the advantages of using solar energy, you need to get to know, initially, the ways solar energy is being generated. There are basically 2 forms of solar energy. We have the thermal solar energy and light solar energy. Thermal energy is believed to be an inactive solar. Its form of energy is made possible through the planning and the parts utilized to construct a house. If you incorporate windows that face the south and the objects that conduct heat, such as stone and brick, you could be able to reduce the energy you use and create energy efficient formation. The thermal energy generated through green solar power is utilized to warm water for solar hot water systems. The radiation coming from the sun creates light and heat which is seized by solar panels to generate electricity for home use.

The major known utilization of green solar power is to cutback spending. Though green solar energy components come with a huge opening investment, but you will rip the benefits in years to come. This is so because it will provide additional electricity for your home use or all of the day-to-day electricity which your home requires. If you make your own solar panel, partaking in government refund and net metering, that is a system whereby you sell the electricity which you do not need to utility power firms. It will aid to lower the expenses of running a solar energy system, that is one of the economic benefits of using solar power. Again, solar energy systems need small to no upkeep maintenance after you have finished setting it up, due to the fact that majority of them require no moving components.

The environmental benefit of using green solar energy is because it is environmental friendly. Considering the fact that our planet is in peril, that is the polar ice caps are decreasing and climate change is producing tragic storms worldwide, it is necessary we take action to reduce global warming and our reliance on fossil fuels. Solar power produces a clean energy, due to the fact that it produces small pollution and it doesn’t add to global warming.

Green solar energy systems can be used by homes and businesses alike. If going solar cannot meet all of your energy needs, it can certainly reduce them. Utilizing green solar energy can save you money, but its greatest benefit is to the environment and our future.

Earth 4 Energy is a DIY manual which consists of videos and guides which you can easily use to build your own solar panel from home for under $200. If you want to live off the grid, now is your opportunity to build yours for less than the price of commercial made ones.
Check it out at http://modospot.com/review/earth4energy.html

Whoever says you can’t “kill two birds with one stone” when becoming more energy efficient is absolutely wrong! There are ways to cut down on your home’s energy expenses while adding beautiful landscapes to the yard and, in turn, likely increasing your home’s value.

A well designed landscape will:

* Cut your summer and winter energy costs dramatically

* Protect your home from winter wind and summer sun

* Reduce consumption of water, pesticides, and fuel for landscaping and lawn maintenance

* Help control noise and air pollution

By planting trees in optimal locations, you can save up to 25% of your home’s energy consumption for heating and cooling, which ends up being anywhere from $100 to $250 annually. In less than 8 years, you will have likely earned back whatever price you put into landscaping the lawn to begin with. And, as stated above, you are realistically raising the value of your home in the process.

“Shading and evapotranspiration (the process by which a plant actively moves and releases water vapor) from trees can reduce surrounding air temperature as much as 9 degrees Fahrenheit.” In addition, the temperature directly underneath the tree may be reduced by as much as 25 degrees Fahrenheit. As well as all of that, the cost of summer air condition bills can be decreased by as much as 15% to 50% with the aid of properly located landscaping.

Depending on what part of the United States you are located in, wind chill factor may be an issue during the winter. As you know, this can drastically drop the temperature by numerous degrees. By adding trees and fences as a windbreak, you can shield your home from the biting wind. When the freezing cold wind hits the walls and windows of your house, it decreases the temperature inside, causing more heat to be needed to offset this temperature reduction. With these landscape additions, you can counteract the negative results of this cold air and prevent having to run the heater as high or as often.

Landscaping Strategies by Region

* Temperature

o Maximize warming effects of the sun in the winter

o Maximize shade during the summer

o Deflect winter winds away from buildings

o Funnel summer breezes toward the home

* Hot-Arid

o Provide shade to cool roofs, walls and windows

o Allow summer winds to access naturally cooled homes

o Block or deflect winds away from air conditioned homes

* Hot-Humid

o Channel summer breezes toward the home

o Maximize summer shade with trees that still allow penetration of low angle winter sun

o Avoid locating planting beds close to the home if they require frequent watering

* Cool

o Use dense windbreaks to protect the home from cold winter winds

o Allow the winter sun to reach south facing windows

o Shade south and west windows and walls from the direct summer sun, if summer overheating is a problem

There has been much debate about what is often called “free” energy-energy that can supposedly, with the right technology, be drawn straight out of the atmosphere, and in very abundant supply. The debates are about whether the stuff actually exists or not, what it would actually cost were it to be harnessed, and if it does exist is it truly as abundant and efficient as it’s being made out to be by proponents of research and development into this potential alternative energy source.

When one hears the phrase “free energy device”, one might be hearing about one of several different concepts. This might mean a device for collecting and transmitting energy from some source that orthodox science does not recognize; a device which collects energy at absolutely no cost; or an example of the legendary perpetual motion machine. Needless to say, a perpetual motion machine-a machine which drives itself, forever, once turned on, therefore needing no energy input ever again and never running out of energy-is impossible. However, it is not so simple to say that a new technology for harnessing the energy “floating” in the atmosphere is impossible. New technologies replace old ones all the time with abilities that had just been “impossible”. Harnessing the power of the atom for providing huge amounts of energy was “impossible” until the 1940s. Flying human beings were an “impossible” thing until the turn of the 20th century and the Wright Brothers’ flight.

The biggest claim of the proponents of “free” energy is that enormous amounts of energy can be drawn from the Zero Point Field. This is a quantum mechanical state of matter for a defined system which is attained when the system is at the lowest possible energy state that it can be in. This is called the “ground state” of the system. Zero Point Energy (ZPE) is sometimes referred to as “residual” energy and it was first proposed to be usable as an alternative form of energy way back in 1913 by Otto Stern and Albert Einstein. It is also referred to as “vacuum energy” in studies of quantum mechanics, and it is supposed to represent the energy of totally empty space. This energy field within the vacuum has been likened to the froth at the base of a waterfall by one of the principal researchers into and proponents of Hal Puthof. Puthof also explains, the term ‘zero-point’ simply means that if the universe were cooled down to absolute zero where all thermal agitation effects would be frozen out, this energy would still remain. What is not as well known, however, even among practicing physicists, are all the implications that derive from this known aspect o quantum physics. However, there are a group of physicists-myself and colleagues at several research labs and universities-who are examining the details, we ask such questions as whether it might be possible to ‘mine’ this reservoir of energy for use as an alternative energy source, or whether this background energy field might be responsible for inertia and gravity. These questions are of interest because it is known that this energy can be manipulated, and therefore there is the possibility that the control of this energy, and possibly inertia and gravity, might yield to engineering solutions. Some progress has been made in a subcategory of this field (cavity quantum electrodynamics) with regard to controlling the emission rates of excited atoms and molecules, of interest in laser research and elsewhere.

Introduction: Energy Savings Tracking Methods
After installing energy conservation measures (ECMs), Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) often determine the energy savings resulting from the project and present the savings results to their customers.  A common way to calculate energy savings is to measure the flows of energy associated with the ECM, and then to apply spreadsheet calculations to determine savings.  For example, a chiller retrofit would might require measurements of chilled water supply and return temperatures and kW.  The benefit of this approach is that the ECM is isolated, and that only energy flows associated with the ECM itself are considered.  

This method is described as Option A or Option B in the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP).  Table 1 presents the different options.  Option A requires some measurement and allows for estimations of some parameters.  Option B requires measurement of all parameters.  In both options, calculations are done (typically in spreadsheets) to determine what energy savings.  Option C uses utility bills to determine energy savings.  

Some ESCOs Have Limited Options
There are many situations where Option A or Option B (Metering and Calculating) is the best approach to measuring energy savings, however, some ESCOs insist upon only using Option A or Option B, when clearly Option C would be most appropriate.  If the ESCO was a lighting contractor, then Option A should work in all cases.  Spot measurements of fixtures before and after, agreed upon hours of operation, and simple calculations can be inserted into a spreadsheet that can calculate savings.  The same spreadsheet can be used over and over.  However, for ESCOs that offer a variety of different retrofits, it is necessary to be able to employ all options so that the best option can be selected for each individual job.  Controls Retrofits, or retrofits to HVAC systems are typically excellent candidates for Option C.

However there are drawbacks with metering and calculating savings and these can include:  
-    Greater expense
-    Difficulties convincing the customer of the appropriateness and veracity of the method and savings numbers
-    Inability to handle interactive or many difficult ECMs.

ESCOs that do not have the capacity to employ all options are at a disadvantage over those ESCOs that can employ them all.  Specifically, we want to address those ESCOs that only employ Option A and Option B.  These ESCOs may encounter the following problems due to their limited offerings:
-    Measurement and Verification costs can be greater, which lead to higher project costs, which can limit the energy projects that the ESCO can sell.  The lack of Measurement and Verification options overall can make the ESCO less competitive, and hurt the financial performance of the ESCO.
-    Using Options A or B sometimes require the customer to understand and approve of complex energy calculations.  These options are often difficult to explain to customers who insist upon seeing savings in their utility bills.  Customer satisfaction can suffer if Option C is not made available to customers who want to see savings on their bills.
-    Options A and B cannot handle difficult ECMs.  The methods used to determine savings are inaccurate, and make large assumptions that cannot be borne out if a third party consultant is hired to oversee the savings determination process.

These issues are discussed in more detail below.

Cost of Utility Bill Analysis vs. Metering and Calculating
Measurement and Verification should cost between 1% and 15% of the project cost.  Metering and calculating savings often has costs associated with labor and equipment.  As many project configurations are different, projects typically require unique configurations of sensors, placements of sensors and savings calculations.  On more complicated ECMs, only highly skilled energy professionals can determine which measurement devices should be applied, and to what components.  Manipulating data, and finally creating spreadsheets with engineering calculations also requires skilled personnel who command high wages.  Metering equipment also has a cost, and for many projects, metering equipment, or control points, have to be purchased, and remain on the job for years.  

Of course, there are cases where metering and calculating is the least expensive and the most desirable method.  If an ESCO only provides a lighting retrofit, then measuring a selection of lighting fixtures before and after the retrofit, and producing a spreadsheet that determines savings is the best option.  

On the other hand, utility bill analysis is inexpensive.  With specialized utility bill analysis software, clerical workers can create the Measurement and Verification analysis.  Bills are entered, weather imported, a linear regression performed, and reports made.  Capital need not be sunk into metering equipment or control points or into long hours of analysis and data manipulation.  Typically for utility bill analysis, measurement and verification costs are a fraction of what costs for retrofit isolation savings are – ranging between 1 and 5% of project costs.

Explaining Savings Numbers to Customers
Customers understand utility bills.  The reason they entered into an energy savings contract is often triggered by the desire to lower their energy bills.  Retrofit Isolation methods do not address the customer’s utility bill.  A project may be saving energy, but the utility bill may actually be increasing.  Retrofit Isolation does not address this at all.  ESCOs need to be responsive to customer’s needs, and this is done through communicating in a manner that the customer’s understand.  They want to see the savings on their utility bills – this is a method they would trust.  

In addition, customers are sometimes mistrustful of energy service companies that provide savings numbers that the customer cannot understand.  Although the calculations in the spreadsheet may appear perfectly reasonable to the energy analyst, to a customer who is not well-versed in math, the calculations may remain incomprehensible, and the customer is thereby required to trust the energy service company, sometimes leading to mistrust.  Energy savings calculations should remain as simple as possible and explained in a manner that the customer can understand.  This makes the customer’s job easier, and reassures the customer that the energy service company is acting in a truthful manner.

For these reason, more and more customers ask for Measurement and Verification using utility bills.  

Difficult and Interactive Energy Conservation Measures
For many energy conservation measures, Retrofit Isolation is the best option.  This would include lighting savings, savings from energy efficient motors, and from other non-weather dependent energy users.  

However it is very difficult or impossible to measure savings for some energy conservation measures.  Still, some ESCOs insist on using Retrofit Isolation for these difficult measures.  For example, engineering calculations can be made estimating the savings to be had by shutting down air handlers at night.  But, assuming that the air handlers receive chilled water from a chilled water loop shared with other air handlers, how is one to measure energy savings?  Fan savings are easy (assuming the unit is constant volume), but in order to calculate savings, several estimations need to be made, which result in an estimate of energy savings, just as accurate before the retrofit took place as after it took place.  Suppose the unit is a VAV system, at what percentage would the fan have been running?  Suppose the cooling coil and/or heating coil modulated to meet a changing supply air set point – how are the fan CFM, cooling and heating loads to be calculated if the unit is not running and measurements can not be made?

Controls retrofits are difficult to measure and quantify directly.  Usually, however, when a controls or commissioning measure is enacted, more than one item is adjusted, which further complicates an already difficult task.  Suppose a partially working economizer was fixed, in addition to putting the fan on a variable speed drive, in addition to shutting off the air handler during unoccupied hours, and finally upgrading the chiller plant.  Each of these measures would interfere with the savings calculations of the other.  How can one calculate chiller savings, when the loads have changed so dramatically via the economizer, reduced hours and reduced air flow?  This is a very difficult task, that most likely cannot be done with an acceptable degree of certainty.  

Complicated cases like this require utility bill analysis to measure and quantify savings.  The procedure is very simple, inexpensive, and easy to explain relative to many Retrofit Isolation methods.

Benefits of Utility Bill Analysis
The benefits of utility bill analysis to calculate energy project savings are as follows:

-    Utility Bill Analysis, by its nature, is relatively simple, and does not require complicated engineering analysis.  
-    Utility Bill Analysis is relatively inexpensive, as it requires less skilled workers, less time and no dedicated equipment.
-    Utility Bill Analysis provides savings numbers in a format and method that makes sense to the customer.  
-    Utility Bill Analysis is the best method to handle complicated energy conservation projects, or projects which interact with each other, making assessment of individual measures impossible.
-    ESCOs can use the fact that energy savings is determined using the customers’ utility bills as a selling point.

Utility Bill Analysis and Changes in Weather
Unfortunately, a simple comparison of pre-retrofit and post-retrofit utility bills is usually not an effective method to determine energy savings from ECMs.  Weather varies from year to year, and affects the amount of heating or cooling energy usage, which can interfere with actual utility savings numbers.  For a fair analysis, utility bills should be “corrected” for weather data, which results in a reasonable savings determination.  Linear regression is applied to utility usage versus degree days to determine pre-retrofit utility usage patterns, which are then compared to post-retrofit utility usage to determine savings.  Unfortunately, the scope of this paper is limited, and cannot present the method in detail.  Weather-correcting for weather is easy, however, as specialized software, used by ESCOs around the world, simplifies the weather correction process and presents savings reports.

Drawbacks of Utility Bill Analysis
Facilities may change their energy usage patterns, by installing more equipment, building additions, occupancy changes, etc.  This upsets the existing utility bill comparison of pre-retrofit to post-retrofit usage.  These changes need to be monitored and accounted for with Baseline Modifications.  

There is a certain amount of randomness in utility bill comparison.  So many factors influence the amount of energy usage in any given month, and they cannot all be accounted for.  As a result, if you are trying to show savings that is less than 10% of the total electricity load, then the randomness in the bills may seriously interfere with the accuracy of your savings calculations.

If you track savings by comparing utility bills, you will only be able to track total savings for a given meter, but you will not be able to separate out the savings for different Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs).  For example, if you installed a lighting retrofit, an energy efficient chiller and a control system in a hospital, you will not be able to tell how much energy is being saved by the control system.  Energy analysts try to do break out the savings for each ECM occasionally, but they are only making educated guesses.  

Conclusion
When an ESCO approaches a performance contract, there are several measurement and verification options available.  Those ESCOs that only have at their disposal a limited set of options are often spending too much money on measurement and verification, and therefore are held back from selling larger projects, and limit their own success.

Customer satisfaction may suffer when ESCOs only offer Retrofit Isolation approaches to Measurement and Verification, as customers may want to see savings in their utility bills.  ESCOs who refuse to speak in the same language or terms as the customer may suffer decreased customer satisfaction.

Many people today have realized the dream of being completely off the grid by combining wind and solar energy. Small sized affordable wind generators are available today for the home user, and they are being combined with photovoltaic cells for power generation. It’s obvious that fossil fuel energy costs are going to keep on rising making it harder to afford getting power from the grid. The time is more than ripe for solar wind energy to be one of the solutions to rising energy costs, and to take us off of fossil fuel energy dependence.

Wind Turbines

Wind turbines are actually very simple machines. They consist of 3 parts: rotor blades, a shaft, and a generator. The rotor blades act like a propeller that turns the shaft when the wind flows through them. The shaft then turns the generator and a current is generated. About eighty-five percent of all off-grid systems use solar wind energy.

The new micro as well as mini wind turbines are very popular with sailors, and are now starting to be more popular with home owners in Europe and the UK. Mini turbines are very cost effective and will only cost about $1,500 to $2,500. They are perfect for generating electricity if you live off the grid in remote rural areas. It’s satisfying to think about having solar wind energy provide for all your energy needs and also knowing that you never have to depend on utility companies.

Photovoltaic Cells

The typical home solar power system consists mainly of these:

a)Photovoltaic Panels

b)Charge Controller Module

c)Batteries (optional)

d)Inverter

Photovoltaic panels convert sunlight into an electric current. The type of current generated by a photovoltaic panel array is DC or direct current. For this current to be usable in most common households, it has to be converted into AC or alternating current. That’s where the inverter comes in. It’s job is to convert DC into AC current.

Solar wind energy systems are also called hybrid energy systems because the use a combination of solar and wind power to generate electricity. The wind turbines are mostly used during the winter months (in the northern hemisphere) when the sun’s vertical rays are mostly directed toward the southern hemisphere, and days tend to be short and cloudy. During summer months, photovoltaic cells would supplement greatly along with the wind turbine.

By using hybrid solar wind energy systems, a homeowner has the option of using or omitting batteries for storage. Homeowners also have the choice of being “Grid-Tied” or “Net Metered”. This means that your solar wind energy system has the ability to provide electricity not only for your house, but the power company as well. This way, if your solar wind energy system generated more energy than was used, the energy can be sold back to the power company. When you’re selling energy back to the company, your power meter runs backward. The “net metered” system therefore is highly recommended. The grid also works as your “battery backup” when your hybrid solar wind energy system doesn’t provide for your power demands.

Net-metered systems are also recommended because they are easier to install, cost less, and offer better performance.

You can improve your lifestyle just by generating free energy and save money. As you may already know, buying a solar panel is extremely expensive and for those like me who can’t afford to buy a solar panel there is another way to save energy: Build a solar panel. Now you will be asking yourselves How to build a solar panel? Well I can assure you that with a little help you can do it. The needed parts can be found very easy and at the same time very cheap. You can find them at your local hardware store and on the internet. I managed to build my own solar panel although I have no technical skills. You can do it too and generate free energy.

Get Best Make Solar Panel and Make Wind Turbine Guide

In order to save more money here are some free save energy tips:
a. Never leave the house without unplugging all the electric devices because they consume energy even on stand by mode
b. Do not leave the lights on in a room you don’t stay in
c. Change your normal light bulbs with energy saving light bulbs

By following these energy saving tips you will be able to reduce your energy costs very easy. The whole world is now in an economical crises and we should think about how to change the way we act. Bulling a solar panel can help you in many ways. You start to generate free energy and save a large amount of money that you can use for the things you like. But here is, in my opinion, the best aspect: you can make a lot of money by building solar panels for other people. Once you finished building your own solar panel you will be able to build more of them and these should be a very nice source of income. So in fact, you not only save money but also make money.

Get Best Make Solar Panel and Make Wind Turbine Guide